Smith v. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MICAH SMITH, § § Defendant Below, § No. 193, 2024 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1512004476 (N) § Appellee. § §

Submitted: January 2, 2025 Decided: March 6, 2025

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to

affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be

affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its April

20, 2024 order denying the appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice

1 State v. Smith, 2024 WL 1907282 (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 30, 2024).