Smith v. Leverette

89 S.E. 1094, 18 Ga. App. 582, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1121
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 21, 1916·No. 7371·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

The only error assigned in this ease being the overruling of the demurrer to the plea and answer of the defendant in the court below, and there being no final judgment excepted to, the bill of exceptions is prematurely brought, and must be dismissed. Civil Code, § 6138; Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges, 9 Ga. App. 722 (72 S. E. 189); Hyland Chemical Co. v. Goddard, 10 Ga. App. 13 (72 S. E. 515); Donalson v. Norman, 14 Ga. App. 146 (80 S. E. 678); National Bank of Tifton v. Brown, 15 Ga. App. 56 (82 S. E. 628); Griffin v. Hollingsworth, 17 Ga. App. 403 (87 S. E. 155).

Writ of error dismissed.

Complaint; from city court of Houston county — Judge Eiley. February 15, 1916. Feagin & Hancoch, for plaintiff. M. Kunz, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Leverette, 89 S.E. 1094, 18 Ga. App. 582, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1121 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

89 S.E. 1094 (Smith v. Leverette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Meacham
138 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Hendricks v. Tyson
103 S.E. 740 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Smith v. Leverett
96 S.E. 8 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)