Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges
This text of 72 S.E. 189 (Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is before us on a main bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment of the lower .court in overruling a demurrer to some of the pleas, and on a cross-bill assigning error on the judgment sustaining the demurrer as to one of the pleas and striking it. There, was no final judgment in the case, and the bills of exceptions embrace matters only of an interlocutory character, which are not the subject-matter of a final bill of exceptions. The writs of error to this court are therefore premature. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6138, 6139; Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co., 120 Ga. 899 (48 S. E. 330) ; Lyndon v. Georgia R. & Elec. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (58 S. E. 1047).
The writs of error on both the main bill of exceptions and the cross-bill are dismissed, with direction that the copies of the bills of exceptions in the office of the clerk of the trial court may operate as exceptions pendente lite. Writs of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 S.E. 189, 9 Ga. App. 722, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-threshing-machine-co-v-hodges-gactapp-1911.