Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges

72 S.E. 189, 9 Ga. App. 722, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 306
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 23, 1911·No. 3075, 3100·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Him, C. J.

This case is before us on a main bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment of the lower .court in overruling a demurrer to some of the pleas, and on a cross-bill assigning error on the judgment sustaining the demurrer as to one of the pleas and striking it. There, was no final judgment in the case, and the bills of exceptions embrace matters only of an interlocutory character, which are not the subject-matter of a final bill of exceptions. The writs of error to this court are therefore premature. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6138, 6139; Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co., 120 Ga. 899 (48 S. E. 330) ; Lyndon v. Georgia R. & Elec. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (58 S. E. 1047).

The writs of error on both the main bill of exceptions and the cross-bill are dismissed, with direction that the copies of the bills of exceptions in the office of the clerk of the trial court may operate as exceptions pendente lite. Writs of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges, 72 S.E. 189, 9 Ga. App. 722, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 306 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

72 S.E. 189 (Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samson Tractor Co. v. Furlong
112 S.E. 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Carhart v. Mackle
96 S.E. 591 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Smith v. Leverette
89 S.E. 1094 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Griffin v. Hollingsworth
87 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
National Bank v. Brown
82 S.E. 628 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Hyland Chemical Co. v. Goddard
72 S.E. 515 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Weatherly Lumber Co. v. Robson & Evans
72 S.E. 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)