National Bank v. Brown
82 S.E. 628, 15 Ga. App. 56, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 15
Opinion
The judgment overruling a demurrer to the defendant’s answer was a mere interlocutory ruling, and, if the decision of the court had been rendered as the losing party claimed it should have been, it would not have resulted in a final disposition of the cause. For this reason the bill of exceptions is premature, and must be dismissed. Civil Code, § 6138; Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges, 9 Ga. App. 722 (73 S. E. 189), and cases there cited; Hyland Chemical Co. v. Goddard, 10 Ga. App. 13 (72 S. E. 515).
The writ of error is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Bank v. Brown, 82 S.E. 628, 15 Ga. App. 56, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).
82 S.E. 628 (National Bank v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Leverette
89 S.E. 1094 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Berrien County Bank v. Brown
82 S.E. 628 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)