Griffin v. Hollingsworth

87 S.E. 155, 17 Ga. App. 403, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 456
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 6, 1915·No. 6454·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

The only error complained of in the bill of exceptions was an interlocutory ruling of the court in sustaining a demurrer to the answer of the defendant in the court below and in striking the answer. Error is not assigned upon a final judgment, and the bill of exceptions is therefore prematurely brought, and must be dismissed. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges, 9 Ga. App. 722 (72 S. E. 189), and cases there cited; Hyland Chemical Co. v. Goddard, 10 Ga. App. 13 (72 S. E. 515); Donalson v. Norman, 14 Ga. App. 146 (80 S. E. 678); National Bank of Tifton v. Brown, and Berrien County Bank v. Brown, 15 Ga. App. 56; Civil Code, § 6138. Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. Hollingsworth, 87 S.E. 155, 17 Ga. App. 403, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 456 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

87 S.E. 155 (Griffin v. Hollingsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reagin v. Stroud
180 S.E. 763 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Samson Tractor Co. v. Furlong
112 S.E. 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Smith v. Leverette
89 S.E. 1094 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)