Griffin v. Hollingsworth

87 S.E. 155, 17 Ga. App. 403, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 456
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 6, 1915
Docket6454
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 155 (Griffin v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffin v. Hollingsworth, 87 S.E. 155, 17 Ga. App. 403, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 456 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Wade, J.

The only error complained of in the bill of exceptions was an interlocutory ruling of the court in sustaining a demurrer to the answer of the defendant in the court below and in striking the answer. Error is not assigned upon a final judgment, and the bill of exceptions is therefore prematurely brought, and must be dismissed. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges, 9 Ga. App. 722 (72 S. E. 189), and cases there cited; Hyland Chemical Co. v. Goddard, 10 Ga. App. 13 (72 S. E. 515); Donalson v. Norman, 14 Ga. App. 146 (80 S. E. 678); National Bank of Tifton v. Brown, and Berrien County Bank v. Brown, 15 Ga. App. 56; Civil Code, § 6138. Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reagin v. Stroud
180 S.E. 763 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Samson Tractor Co. v. Furlong
112 S.E. 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Smith v. Leverette
89 S.E. 1094 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 155, 17 Ga. App. 403, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-hollingsworth-gactapp-1915.