Griffin v. Hollingsworth
This text of 87 S.E. 155 (Griffin v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only error complained of in the bill of exceptions was an interlocutory ruling of the court in sustaining a demurrer to the answer of the defendant in the court below and in striking the answer. Error is not assigned upon a final judgment, and the bill of exceptions is therefore prematurely brought, and must be dismissed. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hodges, 9 Ga. App. 722 (72 S. E. 189), and cases there cited; Hyland Chemical Co. v. Goddard, 10 Ga. App. 13 (72 S. E. 515); Donalson v. Norman, 14 Ga. App. 146 (80 S. E. 678); National Bank of Tifton v. Brown, and Berrien County Bank v. Brown, 15 Ga. App. 56; Civil Code, § 6138. Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 S.E. 155, 17 Ga. App. 403, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-hollingsworth-gactapp-1915.