Smith v. Kneisley

60 P.2d 19, 187 Wash. 699, 1936 Wash. LEXIS 611
Washington Supreme Court·Decided August 13, 1936·No. No. 25668. En Banc.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Joseph B. Smith having recovered a judgment against Lydia Y. Kneisley (Smith v. Kneisley, ante p. 278), sued out a writ of garnishment in the present ancillary action. He obtained judgment against the garnishee defendants below, from which judgment an appeal was taken.

We have reversed the original judgment in the case of Smith v. Kneisley, with directions to dismiss the action; and therefore the garnishment proceeding must fall.

Judgment reversed, with directions to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Kneisley, 60 P.2d 19, 187 Wash. 699, 1936 Wash. LEXIS 611 (Wash. 1936).

60 P.2d 19 (Smith v. Kneisley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levas v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
152 P.2d 320 (Washington Supreme Court, 1944)