Smith v. Kneisley

49 P.2d 918, 184 Wash. 707, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Kneisley. Read the opinion of the Court — 184 Wash. 26
Washington Supreme Court·Decided October 5, 1935·No. No. 25668. Department Two.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Joseph B. Smith sued Lydia Y. Kneisley to recover for alleged services as attorney at law. He recovered judgment. She appealed, with the result that the judgment was reversed, with directions to dismiss the action. After judgment was recovered in that action, he commenced these proceedings in garnishment against the New York Life Insurance Company and Pacific National Bank of Seattle. There was judgment for plaintiff in these proceedings. Lydia Y. Kneisley has appealed.

Upon'the authority of the decision in the original case, Smith v. Kneisley, ante p. 26, 49 P. (2d) 916, the judgment in these garnishment proceedings is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Kneisley, 49 P.2d 918, 184 Wash. 707, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 897 (Wash. 1935).

49 P.2d 918 (Smith v. Kneisley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Kneisley
49 P.2d 916 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)