Smith v. Kneisley

Washington Supreme Court

Smith v. Kneisley

60 P.2d 19, 187 Wash. 699, 1936 Wash. LEXIS 611

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 13, 1936

DocketNo. 25668. En Banc.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 P.2d 19 (Smith v. Kneisley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Kneisley, 60 P.2d 19, 187 Wash. 699, 1936 Wash. LEXIS 611 (Wash. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Joseph B. Smith having recovered a judgment against Lydia Y. Kneisley (Smith v. Kneisley, ante p. 278), sued out a writ of garnishment in the present ancillary action. He obtained judgment against the garnishee defendants below, from which judgment an appeal was taken.

We have reversed the original judgment in the case of Smith v. Kneisley, with directions to dismiss the action; and therefore the garnishment proceeding must fall.

Judgment reversed, with directions to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Joseph B. Smith having recovered a judgment against Lydia Y. Kneisley (Smith v. Kneisley, ante p. 278), sued out a writ of garnishment in the present ancillary action. He obtained judgment against the garnishee defendants below, from which judgment an appeal was taken.

We have reversed the original judgment in the case of Smith v. Kneisley, with directions to dismiss the action; and therefore the garnishment proceeding must fall.

Judgment reversed, with directions to dismiss.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 P.2d 19, 187 Wash. 699, 1936 Wash. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-kneisley-wash-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack