Smith v. Kneisley

49 P.2d 918, 184 Wash. 707, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 897
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 5, 1935
DocketNo. 25668. Department Two.
StatusPublished

This text of 49 P.2d 918 (Smith v. Kneisley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Kneisley, 49 P.2d 918, 184 Wash. 707, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 897 (Wash. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Joseph B. Smith sued Lydia Y. Kneisley to recover for alleged services as attorney at law. He recovered judgment. She appealed, with the result that the judgment was reversed, with directions to dismiss the action. After judgment was recovered in that action, he commenced these proceedings in garnishment against the New York Life Insurance Company and Pacific National Bank of Seattle. There was judgment for plaintiff in these proceedings. Lydia Y. Kneisley has appealed.

Upon'the authority of the decision in the original case, Smith v. Kneisley, ante p. 26, 49 P. (2d) 916, the judgment in these garnishment proceedings is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Kneisley
49 P.2d 916 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 P.2d 918, 184 Wash. 707, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-kneisley-wash-1935.