Smith v. Glendening

53 F. App'x 274
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Glendening. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 F. App'x 317
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2002·No. 02-7228·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Smith has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Smith v. Glendening, No. CA-02-2071-L (D. Md. filed August 13, *275 2002, entered Aug. 14, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Glendening, 53 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2002).

53 F. App'x 274 (Smith v. Glendening) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)