Smith v. Glendening

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Glendening. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 F. App'x 317
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 18, 2002·No. 02-6995·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6995

BERNARD SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PARRIS N. GLENDENING, State of Maryland, Governor; ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Mayor, Washington D.C.; DAVID GARRAGHTY, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-10)

Submitted: September 9, 2002 Decided: September 18, 2002

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bernard Smith appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Smith v. Glendening, No. CA-02-10 (E.D. Va. June 20, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Glendening, (4th Cir. 2002).

Smith v. Glendening (Smith v. Glendening) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related