Smith v. Glendening
This text of Smith v. Glendening (Smith v. Glendening) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6995
BERNARD SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PARRIS N. GLENDENING, State of Maryland, Governor; ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Mayor, Washington D.C.; DAVID GARRAGHTY, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-10)
Submitted: September 9, 2002 Decided: September 18, 2002
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Bernard Smith appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Smith v. Glendening, No. CA-02-10 (E.D. Va. June 20, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. Glendening, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-glendening-ca4-2002.