Sinclair v. State
897 So. 2d 545, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3563, 2005 WL 602623
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sinclair v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 853 So. 2d 551 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sinclair v. State, 897 So. 2d 545, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3563, 2005 WL 602623 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
897 So. 2d 545 (Sinclair v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cooper v. State
817 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)