Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sinclair v. State

Sinclair v. State

812 So. 2d 594, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4439, 2002 WL 500198
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 2002
DocketNo. 1D00-4683
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 812 So. 2d 594 (Sinclair v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sinclair v. State, 812 So. 2d 594, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4439, 2002 WL 500198 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

BARFIELD, J.

The convictions are AFFIRMED. The sentences are REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for resen-tencing. On remand, the trial court may again sentence appellant as a prison re-leasee reoffender if it makes the required findings and the evidence supports those findings. See Boyd v. State, 776 So.2d 317 [595]*595(Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 792 So.2d 1213 (Fla.2001); Randall v. State, 613 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); King v. State, 590 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

ERVIN, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sinclair v. State
853 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
812 So. 2d 594, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4439, 2002 WL 500198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinclair-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.