Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sinclair v. State

Sinclair v. State

890 So. 2d 1240, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 215, 2005 WL 94541
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-4363
StatusPublished

This text of 890 So. 2d 1240 (Sinclair v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sinclair v. State, 890 So. 2d 1240, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 215, 2005 WL 94541 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel fried pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion as untimely. However, because the appellant filed his motion within two years of his conviction and sentence becoming final, we reverse the summary denial and remand for further proceedings. See Brower v. State, 701 So.2d 433, 433 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brower v. State
701 So. 2d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 1240, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 215, 2005 WL 94541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinclair-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.