Sinclair v. State
812 So. 2d 594, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4439, 2002 WL 500198
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 2002·No. No. 1D00-4683·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The convictions are AFFIRMED. The sentences are REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for resen-tencing. On remand, the trial court may again sentence appellant as a prison re-leasee reoffender if it makes the required findings and the evidence supports those findings. See Boyd v. State, 776 So.2d 317 [595]*595(Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 792 So.2d 1213 (Fla.2001); Randall v. State, 613 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); King v. State, 590 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sinclair v. State, 812 So. 2d 594, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4439, 2002 WL 500198 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
812 So. 2d 594 (Sinclair v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sinclair v. State
853 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)