Scott v. State
543 So. 2d 1325, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1385, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3224, 1989 WL 59486
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 519 So. 2d 734 →
Opinion
The appellant contends, and the State, concedes, that the trial court erred in imposing costs against him at sentencing without providing appellant with notice and an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, we quash the imposition of costs and remand the cause for reassessment of costs after proper notice and hearing. See Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Morgan v. State, 527 So.2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Morris v. State, 524 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
Imposition of costs QUASHED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 543 So. 2d 1325, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1385, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3224, 1989 WL 59486 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
543 So. 2d 1325 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morgan v. State
527 So. 2d 968 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Morris v. State
524 So. 2d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Harriel v. State
520 So. 2d 271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)