Scott v. State

531 So. 2d 1068, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2339, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4621, 1988 WL 107124

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1988·No. No. 87-1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but certify the following questions as issues of great public importance:

1. Is that portion of Chapter 87-110, Laws of Florida, which amends section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes, applicable to appellate review of sentences imposed for offenses committed prior to July 1, 1987?

2. Upon a revocation of probation because of the commission of a subsequent criminal act, may the conviction for the subsequent criminal act be utilized as a [1069]*1069justification for departing from the sentencing guidelines?

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but certify the following questions as issues of great public importance:

1. Is that portion of Chapter 87-110, Laws of Florida, which amends section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes, applicable to appellate review of sentences imposed for offenses committed prior to July 1, 1987?

2. Upon a revocation of probation because of the commission of a subsequent criminal act, may the conviction for the subsequent criminal act be utilized as a [1069]*1069justification for departing from the sentencing guidelines?

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Scott v. State, 531 So. 2d 1068, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2339, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4621, 1988 WL 107124 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

531 So. 2d 1068 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Scott v. State

549 So. 2d 1385 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Opinion

Related