Scott v. State
499 So. 2d 29, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 120, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11095
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1986·No. No. 85-186·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendant argues on this appeal that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea of guilty, claiming confusion and misunderstanding on his part as to the consequences of his plea. The record supports the defendant’s claim. Under such circumstances, a defendant should be allowed to withdraw his plea. Thompson v. State, 351 So.2d 701 (Fla.1977); Dominquez v. State, 432 So.2d 799 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
Accordingly, we reverse with directions that the defendant be allowed to withdraw his plea of guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 499 So. 2d 29, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 120, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11095 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
499 So. 2d 29 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pate v. State
547 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Offord v. State
544 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)