Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scott v. State

518 So. 2d 973, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 266, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 1988 WL 3308

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1988

DocketNo. 86-1644

StatusPublished

This text of 518 So. 2d 973 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 518 So. 2d 973, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 266, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 1988 WL 3308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. We affirm, but remand for correction of a technical error.

[974]*974Although defendant contends that the trial court erred in revoking his probation without a sufficient basis, we find that there was sufficient competent evidence to support the revocation.

Defendant also contends, and the state agrees, that the judgment entered after revocation of probation incorrectly lists the burglary conviction as a second degree felony rather than a third degree felony. This should be corrected on remand.

The judgment is affirmed, but is remanded for correction as explained above.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI