Scott v. Chief Medical Examiner

179 A.D.2d 443
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 14, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 443 (Scott v. Chief Medical Examiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Chief Medical Examiner, 179 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

With respect to certain of petitioner’s FOIL requests, the court below correctly determined that they were time-barred by the four-month statutory period contained in CPLR 217. However, with respect to petitioner’s request made May 27, 1988, for certain police records and reports, as well as petitioner’s request made May 16, 1988, requesting a police officer’s memobook, we conclude that the article 78 proceeding was commenced within four months of the final agency action. However, the IAS court’s denial of petitioner’s request was not arbitrary or capricious. These police reports and records, including DD5s are interagency material, which are not final agency policy or determinations, and are exempted from disclosure under FOIL by Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (g) (iii) (see, Oliva v Ward, Index No. 40016/85, Sup Ct, NY County). Further, we conclude that a police officer’s memobook, notwithstanding its evidentiary value at trial, remains the private property of that officer, and is exempted by Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (b), as well as aforesaid section 87 (2) (g).

With respect to petitioner’s reliance on County Law § 677 (3) (b) for a copy of the autopsy report, and related materials, County Law § 2 expressly places New York County, which is wholly contained within a City, beyond the jurisdictional reach of the County Law, absent provision to the contrary. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Legal Aid Society v. New York City Police Department
274 A.D.2d 207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Gould v. New York City Police Department
675 N.E.2d 808 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Qayyam v. New York City Police Department
227 A.D.2d 188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
DeFelice v. New York City Police Department
226 A.D.2d 176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Mitchell v. Borakove
225 A.D.2d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Colon v. Bratton
225 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Scott v. New York City Police Department
225 A.D.2d 338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Gould v. New York City Police Department
223 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Johnson v. New York City Police Department
220 A.D.2d 320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-chief-medical-examiner-nyappdiv-1992.