Gould v. New York City Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gould v. New York City Police Department

223 A.D.2d 468, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 461

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 223 A.D.2d 468 (Gould v. New York City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gould v. New York City Police Department, 223 A.D.2d 468, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered July 13, 1994, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging respondents’ denial of access under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) to, inter alia, certain DD5 reports and police officers’ memo books, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petition was properly denied. As this Court recently held in Matter of Johnson v New York City Police Dept. (220 AD2d 320), "[w]e adhere to our decision in Matter of Scott v Chief Med. Examiner of City of N. Y. (179 AD2d 443, 444, lv denied 79 NY2d 758, cert denied 506 US 891) that DD5 reports and police officers’ memo books are exempt from FOIL disclosure.” Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered July 13, 1994, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging respondents’ denial of access under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) to, inter alia, certain DD5 reports and police officers’ memo books, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petition was properly denied. As this Court recently held in Matter of Johnson v New York City Police Dept. (220 AD2d 320), "[w]e adhere to our decision in Matter of Scott v Chief Med. Examiner of City of N. Y. (179 AD2d 443, 444, lv denied 79 NY2d 758, cert denied 506 US 891) that DD5 reports and police officers’ memo books are exempt from FOIL disclosure.” Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 468, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-new-york-city-police-department-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack