Colon v. Bratton
225 A.D.2d 335, 638 N.Y.2d 910, 638 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093
Opinion
[336] As we held in Matter of Scott v Chief Med. Examiner of City of N. Y. (179 AD2d 443, lv denied 79 NY2d 758, cert denied 506 US 891) and Matter of Johnson v New York City Police Dept. (220 AD2d 320), DD5 reports are exempted from FOIL disclosure by Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (g) (iii). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colon v. Bratton, 225 A.D.2d 335, 638 N.Y.2d 910, 638 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 335 (Colon v. Bratton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. Chief Medical Examiner
179 A.D.2d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Johnson v. New York City Police Department
220 A.D.2d 320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)