Scalione v. Bosch

12 F.2d 172, 56 App. D.C. 231, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 1926
DocketNo. 1825
StatusPublished

This text of 12 F.2d 172 (Scalione v. Bosch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scalione v. Bosch, 12 F.2d 172, 56 App. D.C. 231, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3182 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Opinion

ROBB, J. Associate Justice.

This interfer-

ence involves the same applications of the parties Scalione and Bosch that were involved in the prior interference, patent appeal No. 1824, — App. D. C. — , 12 F.(2d) 171, just decided, and the same contentions are made. It follows that the rulings made in that case are controlling here, and accordingly the decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scalione v. Bosch
12 F.2d 171 (D.C. Circuit, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 F.2d 172, 56 App. D.C. 231, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scalione-v-bosch-cadc-1926.