Scalione v. Heimann
12 F.2d 172, 56 App. D.C. 231, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3183
Opinion
This interfer-
ence involves the same applications of the parties Scalione and Heimann that were involved in Patent Appeal No. 1824, — App. D. C. — , 12 F.(2d) 171, just decided. Heimann relies upon his German application, as did the party Bosch in patent appeal No. 1824. Since the rulings in that case are applicable here, the facts being substantially the same, the decision is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scalione v. Heimann, 12 F.2d 172, 56 App. D.C. 231, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3183 (D.C. Cir. 1926).
12 F.2d 172 (Scalione v. Heimann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scalione v. Bosch
12 F.2d 171 (D.C. Circuit, 1926)