Sanders v. State
256 S.W.3d 617, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 876, 2008 WL 2586628
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanders v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550 →
Opinion
ORDER
Michael Sanders (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanders v. State, 256 S.W.3d 617, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 876, 2008 WL 2586628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
256 S.W.3d 617 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.