Sanders v. State

226 S.W.3d 889, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 911, 2007 WL 1746915
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 19, 2007
DocketNo. ED 88465
StatusPublished

This text of 226 S.W.3d 889 (Sanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. State, 226 S.W.3d 889, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 911, 2007 WL 1746915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnie Sanders appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Morales v. State, 104 S.W.3d 432, 434 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morales v. State
104 S.W.3d 432 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 S.W.3d 889, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 911, 2007 WL 1746915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-state-moctapp-2007.