Sanders v. State
295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550, 2009 WL 3571349
Opinion
ORDER
Charles Sanders appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings based on his claim that he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended *903 opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanders v. State, 295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550, 2009 WL 3571349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
295 S.W.3d 902 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
HASHMAN v. State
295 S.W.3d 902 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)