Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Sanders v. State

Sanders v. State

295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550, 2009 WL 3571349
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 3, 2009
DocketWD 70085
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 295 S.W.3d 902 (Sanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. State, 295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550, 2009 WL 3571349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Charles Sanders appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings based on his claim that he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended *903 opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HASHMAN v. State
295 S.W.3d 902 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550, 2009 WL 3571349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-state-moctapp-2009.