HASHMAN v. State
295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554, 2009 WL 3571351
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Larry Hashman appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Hashman argues that trial counsel was ineffective for submitting an erroneous instruction on the lesser-included offense of second-degree assault.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
HASHMAN v. State, 295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554, 2009 WL 3571351 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
295 S.W.3d 902 (HASHMAN v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sanders v. State
295 S.W.3d 902 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)