HASHMAN v. State
295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554, 2009 WL 3571351
This text of 295 S.W.3d 902 (HASHMAN v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
HASHMAN v. State, 295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554, 2009 WL 3571351 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Larry Hashman appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Hashman argues that trial counsel was ineffective for submitting an erroneous instruction on the lesser-included offense of second-degree assault.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sanders v. State
295 S.W.3d 902 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
295 S.W.3d 902, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554, 2009 WL 3571351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hashman-v-state-moctapp-2009.