Sanders v. State

226 S.W.3d 889, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 911, 2007 WL 1746915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanders v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 19, 2007·No. No. ED 88465·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnie Sanders appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Morales v. State, 104 S.W.3d 432, 434 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. State, 226 S.W.3d 889, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 911, 2007 WL 1746915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

226 S.W.3d 889 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morales v. State
104 S.W.3d 432 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)