Sanchez v. State
866 So. 2d 218, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2160, 2004 WL 360578
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 2004·No. No. 3D03-1126·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Based on the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing as the defendant had a right to be present and represented by counsel at his resentencing following his successful 3.850 challenge. Jordan v. State, 853 So.2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Barcelo v. State, 774 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The remaining point raised by the defendant lacks merit.
[219]*219Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanchez v. State, 866 So. 2d 218, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2160, 2004 WL 360578 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
866 So. 2d 218 (Sanchez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Veal v. State
895 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)