Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Veal v. State

Veal v. State

895 So. 2d 1280, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3568, 2005 WL 602686
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 2005
DocketNo. 3D03-3232
StatusPublished

This text of 895 So. 2d 1280 (Veal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veal v. State, 895 So. 2d 1280, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3568, 2005 WL 602686 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the state’s proper confession of error, we reverse the order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief to vacate his sentence. As the state correctly asserts, the trial court erred in denying defendant’s request for the assistance of counsel at resentencing, see, e.g., [1281]*1281Sanchez v. State, 866 So.2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), and on the appeal therefrom. Vaughn v. State, 888 So.2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Libretti v. State, 854 So.2d 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). The trial court shall vacate defendant’s sentence and appoint counsel to represent defendant on resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vaughn v. State
888 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Libretti v. State
854 So. 2d 804 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Sanchez v. State
866 So. 2d 218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 So. 2d 1280, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3568, 2005 WL 602686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veal-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.