Sanchez v. State
This text of 866 So. 2d 218 (Sanchez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Based on the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing as the defendant had a right to be present and represented by counsel at his resentencing following his successful 3.850 challenge. Jordan v. State, 853 So.2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Barcelo v. State, 774 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The remaining point raised by the defendant lacks merit.
[219]*219Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
866 So. 2d 218, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2160, 2004 WL 360578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.