Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sanchez v. State

Sanchez v. State

818 So. 2d 684, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8214, 2002 WL 1284394
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanchez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 765 So. 2d 246 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 2002·No. No. 4D01-1495·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Nicarry v. State, 795 So.2d 1114, 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that “the breaking into a building or structure for the purpose of continuing an offense in progress [such as fleeing and eluding] is sufficient to establish burglary.”).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanchez v. State, 818 So. 2d 684, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8214, 2002 WL 1284394 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

818 So. 2d 684 (Sanchez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicarry v. State
795 So. 2d 1114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)