Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sanchez v. State

870 So. 2d 2, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7155, 2003 WL 21121676

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 16, 2003

DocketNo. 2D03-170

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 870 So. 2d 2 (Sanchez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. State, 870 So. 2d 2, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7155, 2003 WL 21121676 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ALTENBERND, Chief Judge.

Domingo Sanchez appeals the denial of his postconviction motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He claims that his sentence is illegal under this court’s holding in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The trial court summarily denied this motion, ruling that legislative enactments after Taylor transformed Mr. Sanchez’s sentence into a legal sentence. The trial court ruled prior to the issuance of this court’s recent decision in Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with the Fourth and Fifth Districts’ cases with which we disagreed in Green. Id. at 755. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further consideration of the motion.

Reversed and remanded.

CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALTENBERND, Chief Judge.

Domingo Sanchez appeals the denial of his postconviction motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He claims that his sentence is illegal under this court’s holding in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The trial court summarily denied this motion, ruling that legislative enactments after Taylor transformed Mr. Sanchez’s sentence into a legal sentence. The trial court ruled prior to the issuance of this court’s recent decision in Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with the Fourth and Fifth Districts’ cases with which we disagreed in Green. Id. at 755. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further consideration of the motion.

Reversed and remanded.

CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

870 So. 2d 2, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7155, 2003 WL 21121676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack