Sanchez v. State
675 So. 2d 263, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6776, 1996 WL 346947
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1996·No. No. 95-3132·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, but remand because the written order did not set forth both of the specific violations found, although they were orally stated. Robinson v. State, 609 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanchez v. State, 675 So. 2d 263, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6776, 1996 WL 346947 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
675 So. 2d 263 (Sanchez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mack v. State
694 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)