Sanchez v. State
693 So. 2d 678
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 1997·No. Nos. 95-2038, 95-2336·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find, as the State properly concedes, that the trial court erred by sentencing the defendant, Guillermo Sanchez, to a three-year minimum mandatory term for the use of a firearm to run consecutively to the minimum mandatory terms imposed pursuant to the habitual violent offender statute. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing consistent with Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995).
The defendant’s remaining points lack merit.
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanchez v. State, 693 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
693 So. 2d 678 (Sanchez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sanchez v. State
848 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Tunsil v. State
797 So. 2d 651 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)