Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sanchez v. State

693 So. 2d 678

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 1997

DocketNos. 95-2038, 95-2336

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 693 So. 2d 678 (Sanchez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. State, 693 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find, as the State properly concedes, that the trial court erred by sentencing the defendant, Guillermo Sanchez, to a three-year minimum mandatory term for the use of a firearm to run consecutively to the minimum mandatory terms imposed pursuant to the habitual violent offender statute. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing consistent with Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995).

The defendant’s remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find, as the State properly concedes, that the trial court erred by sentencing the defendant, Guillermo Sanchez, to a three-year minimum mandatory term for the use of a firearm to run consecutively to the minimum mandatory terms imposed pursuant to the habitual violent offender statute. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing consistent with Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995).

The defendant’s remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 So. 2d 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack