Salyard v. Salyard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Salyard v. Salyard

63 S.E.2d 398, 207 Ga. 619, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 474

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 14, 1951·No. 17343·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Head, Justice.

The delay in tendering the corrected bill of exceptions in this case was unreasonable. The certificate of the trial judge does not show that the delay was occasioned by providential cause or imperative necessity, and the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. Allison v. Jowers, 94 Ga. 335 (21 S. E. 570); Sutton v. Valdosta Guano Co., 115 Ga. 794 (42 S. E. 94); Walker v. Wood, 119 Ga. 624 (46 S. E. 869); Atkins v. Winter, 121 Ga. 75 (48 S. E. 717); Meador v. Callicott, 129 Ga. 631 (60 S. E. 863); Whitley v. Kelly, 136 Ga. 835 (72 S. E. 346); Mulling v. Exchange Bank of Waycross, 137 Ga. 431 (73 S. E. 654) ; Kent v. Geiger, 138 Ga. 248 (75 S. E. 104); Jensen v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co., 143 Ga. 724 (85 S. E. 873); Hayes v. Chapman, 147 Ga. 626 (2) (95 S. E. 216); Mathis v. Prigmore, 148 Ga. 497 (96 S. E. 1038); Turner v. Turner, 191 Ga. 123 (12 S. E. 2d, 633).

Writ of eiror dismissed.

All the Justices concur. *620 Hams Bullock and James G. Lamar, for plaintiff. Samuel L. Eplan, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head, Justice.

The delay in tendering the corrected bill of exceptions in this case was unreasonable. The certificate of the trial judge does not show that the delay was occasioned by providential cause or imperative necessity, and the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. Allison v. Jowers, 94 Ga. 335 (21 S. E. 570); Sutton v. Valdosta Guano Co., 115 Ga. 794 (42 S. E. 94); Walker v. Wood, 119 Ga. 624 (46 S. E. 869); Atkins v. Winter, 121 Ga. 75 (48 S. E. 717); Meador v. Callicott, 129 Ga. 631 (60 S. E. 863); Whitley v. Kelly, 136 Ga. 835 (72 S. E. 346); Mulling v. Exchange Bank of Waycross, 137 Ga. 431 (73 S. E. 654) ; Kent v. Geiger, 138 Ga. 248 (75 S. E. 104); Jensen v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co., 143 Ga. 724 (85 S. E. 873); Hayes v. Chapman, 147 Ga. 626 (2) (95 S. E. 216); Mathis v. Prigmore, 148 Ga. 497 (96 S. E. 1038); Turner v. Turner, 191 Ga. 123 (12 S. E. 2d, 633).

Writ of eiror dismissed.

All the Justices concur. *620 Hams Bullock and James G. Lamar, for plaintiff. Samuel L. Eplan, for defendant.

Salyard v. Salyard, 63 S.E.2d 398, 207 Ga. 619, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 474 (Ga. 1951).

Pincite

63 S.E.2d 398 (Salyard v. Salyard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related