Jensen v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co.
This text of 85 S.E. 873 (Jensen v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To the direction of a verdict rendered on January 13, 1914, a bill of exceptions was sued out, which contained eight pages. In the certificate the trial judge stated: “This bill of exceptions was presented to me on February 2nd, 1914. I was out of the State during the month of February, 1914. I turned over the bill of exceptions to counsel for defendant in error, March 5th, 1914. He stated that the bill of exceptions was not correct; and I requested counsel for defendant in error and plaintiff in error to try to agree upon the bill. It was presented to me again and agreed upon by counsel this May 23rd, 1914, on which day I sign this certificate.” On motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions, on the ground thp,t it is not certified within the time required by law: Eeld, that the motion must prevail. Walker v. Wood, 119 Ga. [725]*725624 (46 S. E. 869); Dykes v. Brock, 128 Ga. 395 (57 S. E. 700); Duke v. Kelly, 136 Ga. 832 (72 S. E. 250).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 873, 143 Ga. 724, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jensen-v-jacobs-pharmacy-co-ga-1915.