Floyd v. Floyd
This text of 110 S.E.2d 405 (Floyd v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The judgment assigned as error was entered on October 27, 1958. On November 26, 1958, a bill of exceptions was tendered to the trial judge. The bill of exceptions recites that, on November 29, 1958, “it was, with the consent [285]*285of both the plaintiff in error and defendant in error, returned, without a hearing thereon as to the correctness and completeness thereof, to the plaintiff in error for the preparation and approval of the brief of evidence specified therein, . . The bill of exceptions was retendered to the trial judge on May 21, 1959, and with reference to the delay in retendering the bill of exceptions, it is recited “that both parties have made known to me their agreement that it be held by plaintiff in error until this date and retendered, to me on this date, . . .” Held:
The certificate of the trial judge does not show that -the delay in retendering the bill of exceptions was occasioned by providential cause or imperative necessity, and the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. Salyard v. Salyard, 207 Ga. 619 (63 S. E. 2d 398), and cases cited; Phillips v. Taylor, 214 Ga. 221 (104 S. E. 2d 96).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 S.E.2d 405, 215 Ga. 284, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-floyd-ga-1959.