Kent v. Geiger
75 S.E. 104, 138 Ga. 248, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 272
Opinion
A bill of exceptions, having been tendered to the trial j ridge for certification on a given date, was returned by him to counsel for plaintiff in .error for correction, and was certified at a date thirty-four days later. The certified bill of exceptions contained ten typewritten pages. In the absence of any statement as to the cause of delay, it must be held that such delay was unreasonable, and therefore that the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. Mulling v. Exchange Bank of Waycross, 137 Ga. 431 (73 S. E. 654).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kent v. Geiger, 75 S.E. 104, 138 Ga. 248, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 272 (Ga. 1912).
75 S.E. 104 (Kent v. Geiger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phillips v. Taylor
104 S.E.2d 96 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Stribling v. Catoosa County
98 S.E.2d 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Salyard v. Salyard
63 S.E.2d 398 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Mathis v. Prigmore
96 S.E. 1038 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Hayes v. Chapman
95 S.E. 216 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Wilson v. Green
82 S.E. 241 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)