Rose v. Silver

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Rose v. Silver

398 A.2d 787, 1979 D.C. App. LEXIS 294

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 1, 1979

Docket12555

StatusPublished

Cited by26 cases

This text of 398 A.2d 787 (Rose v. Silver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. Silver, 398 A.2d 787, 1979 D.C. App. LEXIS 294 (D.C. 1979).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc of 394 A.2d 1368 and it appearing that a majority of the judges of this Court has voted to deny the petition, it is

ORDERED that appellees’ petition is denied.

NEBEKER and HARRIS, JJ., would grant the petition.

HARRIS, J., filed a separate statement of his reasons, concurred in by NEBEKER, J.

GALLAGHER, J., filed the attached separate statement of reasons for not voting in favor of the petition for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI