Rodriguez v. State

209 So. 3d 73, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19254
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8501
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 2016·No. No. 3D16-897·Published

Opinion

SHEPHERD, J.

Andy Rodriguez appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Rodriguez raised nine claims. We affirm the denial of [74]*74the motion as to claims two through eight without further discussion. We ordered the State to respond to claims one and nine. As to these claims, which the State contends are refuted by the record, we reverse and remand for attachment of those portions of the record which conclusively refute Rodriguez’s claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to move to suppress defendant’s incriminating statements and for failing to object to the trial court giving a defective self-defense jury instruction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 209 So. 3d 73, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19254 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

209 So. 3d 73 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.