Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State

182 So. 3d 854, 2016 WL 67355
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14420 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 2016·No. No. 4D13-1403·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Broughton v. State, 790 So.2d 1118, 1118-19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that the standard instruction informing the jury that it was “the judge’s job to determine a proper sentence” was not misleading even though' the State sought to have the defendant designated as a prison released reoffender).

CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 182 So. 3d 854, 2016 WL 67355 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

182 So. 3d 854 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broughton v. State
790 So. 2d 1118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)