Rodriguez v. State

182 So. 3d 854, 2016 WL 67355
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 6, 2016
DocketNo. 4D13-1403
StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 3d 854 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. State, 182 So. 3d 854, 2016 WL 67355 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Broughton v. State, 790 So.2d 1118, 1118-19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that the standard instruction informing the jury that it was “the judge’s job to determine a proper sentence” was not misleading even though' the State sought to have the defendant designated as a prison released reoffender).

CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broughton v. State
790 So. 2d 1118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 3d 854, 2016 WL 67355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.