Rodriguez v. State

189 So. 3d 878, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1449, 2016 WL 424596
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14420
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 2016·No. No. 4D15-0800·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accept the state’s concession of error on appeal, vacate the order of the trial court entered November 21, 2014, and remand with directions that the trial court grant appellant an evidentiary hearing on his claim that counsel retained by appellant’s father failed to timely file an amended motion for post-conviction relief, as permitted in Rodriguez v. State, 100 So.3d 1244, 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). See Medrano v. State, 748 So.2d 986, 987 (Fla.1999); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931 (Fla.1999).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 189 So. 3d 878, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1449, 2016 WL 424596 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

189 So. 3d 878 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steele v. Kehoe
747 So. 2d 931 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Medrano v. State
748 So. 2d 986 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Rodriguez v. State
100 So. 3d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)