Rodriguez v. State
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 28, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D16-897 Lower Tribunal No. 09-32799 ________________
Andy Rodriguez, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.
Andy Rodriguez, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, LAGOA and EMAS, JJ.
SHEPHERD, J. Andy Rodriguez appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-
conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his
motion, Rodriguez raised nine claims. We affirm the denial of the motion as to
claims two through eight without further discussion. We ordered the State to
respond to claims one and nine. As to these claims, which the State contends are
refuted by the record, we reverse and remand for attachment of those portions of
the record which conclusively refute Rodriguez’s claims of ineffective assistance
of trial counsel for failing to move to suppress defendant’s incriminating
statements and for failing to object to the trial court giving a defective self-defense
jury instruction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A),(D).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. State (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.