Rodriguez v. State
820 So. 2d 1051, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626, 2002 WL 1466259
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3080·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
As we conclude that the evidence adduced at the probation revocation hearing was sufficient to support the trial court’s revocation of the appellant’s probation according to its oral pronouncements, we affirm the same. We do, however, remand for the trial court to enter a written order consistent with its oral pronouncements. See Cifuentes v. State, 717 So.2d 136 (Fla. [1052]*10523d DCA 1998); Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. State, 820 So. 2d 1051, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626, 2002 WL 1466259 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
820 So. 2d 1051 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shuler v. State
7 So. 3d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Rodriguez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS
820 So. 2d 1051 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)