Rodriguez v. State

762 So. 2d 586, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9349, 2000 WL 986393
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 So. 2d 1215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1258·Published

Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing Granted

PER CURIAM.

Victor Rodriguez appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence as a Violent Career Criminal under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1995). We find no merit to the arguments relating to the appeal of the convictions. We also agree with the State’s position in its Motion for Rehearing and find no merit in the defendant’s challenge to his sentence.

Individuals such as defendant “who are challenging the violent career criminal sentencing provisions enacted by chapter 95-182 have standing to do so if the relevant criminal offense or offenses occurred on or after October 1, 1995, and before May 24, 1997.” Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667, 671 (Fla.2000). Defendant’s offense occurred on October 30, 1998, which falls outside of the period available for challenge.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 762 So. 2d 586, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9349, 2000 WL 986393 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

762 So. 2d 586 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salters v. State
758 So. 2d 667 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)