Rodriguez v. State

715 So. 2d 329, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9537, 1998 WL 422532
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1998·No. No. 97-3790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Geddis v. State, 715 So.2d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). However, unlike Geddis, in this case, the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not conclusively refuted by the trial record; accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant pursuing his claim via Rule 3.850.

FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., and KROLL, KATHLEEN J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 715 So. 2d 329, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9537, 1998 WL 422532 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

715 So. 2d 329 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballard v. State
780 So. 2d 1024 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)